Comments on: Calgary 2 - San Jose 3 : Flames Squander Lead http://www.flamesforum.com/news/2008-04-15/calgary-2-san-jose-3-flames-squander-lead/ Exclusive Calgary Flames news and game reports from FlamesForum. Post a comment or topic in front of thousands of fans! Tue, 06 Jan 2009 20:24:43 +0000 http://wordpress.org/?v=2.7 hourly 1 By: anar http://www.flamesforum.com/news/2008-04-15/calgary-2-san-jose-3-flames-squander-lead/comment-page-1/#comment-11773 anar Wed, 16 Apr 2008 16:45:36 +0000 http://www.flamesforum.com/?p=309#comment-11773 For reasons beyond belief, the Flames were not themselves and the chemistry that was evident in game 3 (the great comeback) was apparently absent. Additionally being 0 for 4 on the power play was unusual, and more importantly, the 10-2 shots on goal (in the 1st period) in favor of the Sharks reveal a different story. I'm not sure if this is the end actually. It could be a new beginning. For reasons beyond belief, the Flames were not themselves and the chemistry that was evident in game 3 (the great comeback) was apparently absent. Additionally being 0 for 4 on the power play was unusual, and more importantly, the 10-2 shots on goal (in the 1st period) in favor of the Sharks reveal a different story. I'm not sure if this is the end actually. It could be a new beginning.

]]> By: cho http://www.flamesforum.com/news/2008-04-15/calgary-2-san-jose-3-flames-squander-lead/comment-page-1/#comment-11772 cho Wed, 16 Apr 2008 15:58:28 +0000 http://www.flamesforum.com/?p=309#comment-11772 Flames gave them life and that's poor. Would have expected a higher intensity at the end. http://www.flamesforum.com/forums/viewtopic.php?t=661 Flames gave them life and that's poor. Would have expected a higher intensity at the end.

http://www.flamesforum.com/forums/viewtopic.php?t=661

]]>