Comments on: Dion Phaneuf Traded for Stajan, White, Hagman: Unpacking the Transaction http://www.flamesforum.com/news/2010-01-31/dion-phaneuf-traded-for-backs-of-pucks-and-hagman/ Fan inspiried Calgary Flames news & game reports from FlamesForum. Have your say in front of thousands of Flames fans! Sat, 31 Jul 2010 09:12:33 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0 By: anar http://www.flamesforum.com/news/2010-01-31/dion-phaneuf-traded-for-backs-of-pucks-and-hagman/comment-page-1/#comment-48628 anar Tue, 02 Feb 2010 20:14:55 +0000 http://www.flamesforum.com/?p=1638#comment-48628 In all fairness, I wish I could punch someone for the blunder they keep on making that affects the Calgary Flames. Why did the blockbuster move happen only weeks after the stupid mouse was here in Calgary? This is a critical period.... the Flames had lost so many games and they had just begun to revive their approach....they have to win so many games, but considering what is happening, it is less likely that they will accomplish their goals. Believe me, as a fan, I really wish nobody shows up at the Saddledome!.. In all fairness, I wish I could punch someone for the blunder they keep on making that affects the Calgary Flames. Why did the blockbuster move happen only weeks after the stupid mouse was here in Calgary? This is a critical period.... the Flames had lost so many games and they had just begun to revive their approach....they have to win so many games, but considering what is happening, it is less likely that they will accomplish their goals. Believe me, as a fan, I really wish nobody shows up at the Saddledome!..

]]> By: daryl http://www.flamesforum.com/news/2010-01-31/dion-phaneuf-traded-for-backs-of-pucks-and-hagman/comment-page-1/#comment-48624 daryl Tue, 02 Feb 2010 18:14:19 +0000 http://www.flamesforum.com/?p=1638#comment-48624 GB had nothing to do with Anar, relax. GB had nothing to do with Anar, relax.

]]> By: anar http://www.flamesforum.com/news/2010-01-31/dion-phaneuf-traded-for-backs-of-pucks-and-hagman/comment-page-1/#comment-48572 anar Mon, 01 Feb 2010 06:02:43 +0000 http://www.flamesforum.com/?p=1638#comment-48572 This is the worse year of the decade considering that fans were anticipating 2010 to be the year of Lord Stanley.. It will take 20 more now. Yeah, Dion will become much better in two years and we will be grinding out teeth. I wonder whether that mouse played his game while he was here in Calgary a couple of weeks ago? This is the worse year of the decade considering that fans were anticipating 2010 to be the year of Lord Stanley.. It will take 20 more now. Yeah, Dion will become much better in two years and we will be grinding out teeth. I wonder whether that mouse played his game while he was here in Calgary a couple of weeks ago?

]]> By: cindy http://www.flamesforum.com/news/2010-01-31/dion-phaneuf-traded-for-backs-of-pucks-and-hagman/comment-page-1/#comment-48564 cindy Mon, 01 Feb 2010 04:20:14 +0000 http://www.flamesforum.com/?p=1638#comment-48564 Was this the best or worst kept secret up til today? Did Phaneuf know before last night's game? I tend to agree with some of my fellow bloggers that players who get traded from Calgary seem to reach their potential elsewhere. What's up what that? AND I agree that Tanguay Huselius and Camelleri did add alot to Calgary's offence. Offence we need now and I doubt any of the recently acquired players have their stature. Seems it doesn't matter whether you have talent. If you don't toe the Sutter line you are gone. I sure hope this isn't just a short term fix that we will regret later on. Too bad it had to get to this point... we live in interesting times. Was this the best or worst kept secret up til today? Did Phaneuf know before last night's game? I tend to agree with some of my fellow bloggers that players who get traded from Calgary seem to reach their potential elsewhere. What's up what that? AND I agree that Tanguay Huselius and Camelleri did add alot to Calgary's offence. Offence we need now and I doubt any of the recently acquired players have their stature. Seems it doesn't matter whether you have talent. If you don't toe the Sutter line you are gone. I sure hope this isn't just a short term fix that we will regret later on. Too bad it had to get to this point... we live in interesting times.

]]> By: Barry Flames http://www.flamesforum.com/news/2010-01-31/dion-phaneuf-traded-for-backs-of-pucks-and-hagman/comment-page-1/#comment-48559 Barry Flames Sun, 31 Jan 2010 21:31:52 +0000 http://www.flamesforum.com/?p=1638#comment-48559 One interesting thoughts Sutter made was how much $$$ the D were getting and how he didn't like how core players on D were getting money that could be invested with forwards. My thought initially was 'Sutter, YOU SIGNED all the Dmen so YOU CAUSED THE PROBLEM!' One interesting thoughts Sutter made was how much $$$ the D were getting and how he didn't like how core players on D were getting money that could be invested with forwards. My thought initially was 'Sutter, YOU SIGNED all the Dmen so YOU CAUSED THE PROBLEM!'

]]> By: Barry Flames http://www.flamesforum.com/news/2010-01-31/dion-phaneuf-traded-for-backs-of-pucks-and-hagman/comment-page-1/#comment-48555 Barry Flames Sun, 31 Jan 2010 20:31:32 +0000 http://www.flamesforum.com/?p=1638#comment-48555 My Q after the dust settles is what do we do with THREE extra forwards? Mayers, Hagman, Stajan, what happens when Moss, Dawes, and Conroy get healthy? Or is one or more injured? My Q after the dust settles is what do we do with THREE extra forwards? Mayers, Hagman, Stajan, what happens when Moss, Dawes, and Conroy get healthy? Or is one or more injured?

]]> By: Del http://www.flamesforum.com/news/2010-01-31/dion-phaneuf-traded-for-backs-of-pucks-and-hagman/comment-page-1/#comment-48552 Del Sun, 31 Jan 2010 20:27:52 +0000 http://www.flamesforum.com/?p=1638#comment-48552 Ok, we wanted a trade, but WTF? I'm not sad to see Phanueff go, but Hagman, White? Mayers? I think Sutter could have done a lot better, even if he had to wait a little longer. Let's hope this works out. We just finished beating one bottom feeder and we trade with the eastern one? Ok, we wanted a trade, but WTF? I'm not sad to see Phanueff go, but Hagman, White? Mayers? I think Sutter could have done a lot better, even if he had to wait a little longer.
Let's hope this works out.

We just finished beating one bottom feeder and we trade with the eastern one?

]]> By: Barry Flames http://www.flamesforum.com/news/2010-01-31/dion-phaneuf-traded-for-backs-of-pucks-and-hagman/comment-page-1/#comment-48547 Barry Flames Sun, 31 Jan 2010 19:51:17 +0000 http://www.flamesforum.com/?p=1638#comment-48547 The obvious: expect Lundmark and Backlund to head back down to the minors. The obvious: expect Lundmark and Backlund to head back down to the minors.

]]> By: Barry Flames http://www.flamesforum.com/news/2010-01-31/dion-phaneuf-traded-for-backs-of-pucks-and-hagman/comment-page-1/#comment-48546 Barry Flames Sun, 31 Jan 2010 19:45:21 +0000 http://www.flamesforum.com/?p=1638#comment-48546 Phaneuf was definitely disappointing about the trade and we'll have to see if he'll be able to pick up the pieces in T Dot. I doubt he will this year. Phaneuf was definitely disappointing about the trade and we'll have to see if he'll be able to pick up the pieces in T Dot. I doubt he will this year.

]]> By: Barry Flames http://www.flamesforum.com/news/2010-01-31/dion-phaneuf-traded-for-backs-of-pucks-and-hagman/comment-page-1/#comment-48545 Barry Flames Sun, 31 Jan 2010 19:39:39 +0000 http://www.flamesforum.com/?p=1638#comment-48545 The funny thing is buddy and I were talking about Gary Leeman as the answer to our problems (jokingly of course). Lo and behold.... The funny thing is buddy and I were talking about Gary Leeman as the answer to our problems (jokingly of course). Lo and behold....

]]>